Skip to page content

Better Data Equals Greater Pay Equality

Filed in Data, Equal Pay, Women By , and on January 29, 2016
women turning open sign on front door of a store

Credit: Ben Bloom via Getty Images

Federal law has banned pay discrimination since 1963. But more than 50 years later, many in the American workplace − because of their sex, race or ethnicity − don’t get equal pay for equal work. Unlawful pay discrimination shortchanges workers by thousands of dollars a year, affecting people’s ability to support their families today and accumulate retirement savings and Social Security benefits for tomorrow.

Editor’s note: This has been shared from the Huffington Post. View the original here.

Today, 57 percent of women work outside the home, but the typical woman working full-time full-year still makes 21 percent less than the typical man working full-time full-year. And the pay gap is significantly greater for women of color: the typical black non-Hispanic woman made only 60 percent of a typical white non-Hispanic man’s earnings, while the typical Hispanic woman earned only 55 percent.

That is why today, as the nation commemorates the seventh anniversary of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is taking another important step toward combating pay discrimination. The EEOC is proposing to revise the Employer Information Report (EEO-1) to require employers with 100 or more workers to report pay data, and is seeking public comment on its approach.

For decades, the EEOC has collected annual workforce demographic data by race, ethnicity, sex and job category from certain private employers, including federal contractors. Now, for the first time, it would also collect certain pay data to help the EEOC and the Department of Labor identify potential pay discrimination and support employers’ voluntary compliance with federal law. The new pay data would provide the EEOC and the Department of Labor with insight into pay disparities within industries and occupations. The agencies would use the pay data to encourage compliance with equal pay laws, assess discrimination complaints, better focus agency resources where there may be disparities, and reduce burdens on other employers.

This new pay data will allow the EEOC to compile and publish aggregated figures that will help employers in conducting their own analysis of their pay practices to assist in their compliance efforts. The Labor Department’s Office of Federal Compliance Contract Programs, using other data sources, will also make pay data available to the public. These data will also provide job seekers and workers with information on the aggregate pay for job groups across industries, and by gender, race and ethnicity.

To increase efficiency and minimize the burden on employers, the EEOC and the Department of Labor have chosen to collaborate on the collection of compensation data rather than undertake separate collections. Both agencies recognize the need to streamline data collection and avoid duplicative reporting requirements.

Employers, including federal contractors, have submitted similar reports for many years, and this new pay data collection will build on established practices. Employers and contractors with 100 or more employees would supplement their existing reports with basic pay range information and hours worked data starting in September 2017. To protect worker privacy, employers will not be required to submit individual-level pay data; employers would report the number of employees within set pay bands.

The Obama administration has, from early on, placed a premium on combating pay discrimination. “We’re going to crack down on violations of equal pay laws so that women get equal pay for an equal day’s work,” announced President Obama in his State of the Union address on Jan. 27, 2010. He made good on that promise the following month by unveiling his National Equal Pay Task Force. The task force brought together the EEOC, Department of Labor, Department of Justice and Office of Personnel Management to address pay discrimination and has issued reports on its progress, including Fighting for Equal Pay in the Workforce, Keeping America’s Women Moving Forward and Fifty Years After the Equal Pay Act.

In addition to these efforts, the president signed a presidential memorandum in May 2013 directing the Office of Personnel Management to develop a government-wide strategy to address the gender pay gap in the federal workforce, leading to a report in April 2014 and new guidance in July 2015 (which cautioned against required reliance on a candidate’s existing salary to set pay, which can potentially adversely affect women who may have taken time off from their careers).

The president also issued an executive order in April 2014 prohibiting federal contractors from discriminating against employees who choose to discuss their pay compensation. And today’s proposal to collect compensation data is another step toward making equal pay a reality.

The collection of robust, reliable pay data is an important step toward reducing discrimination and finally closing unfair pay gaps. Close collaboration between the EEOC and the Department of Labor, combined with the agencies’ significant enforcement experience, will lead to better information for workers, job seekers and employers; improved compliance with equal pay laws; and, ultimately, greater pay equality across the workforce.

Follow Secretary Perez on Twitter and Instagram as @LaborSec. Jenny R. Yang is the chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Valerie Jarrett is a senior adviser to President Obama and chair of the White House Council on Women and Girls.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments (8)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Mary H. says:

    This is great but how will small business employees be protected under the new equal fair pay act? Also, how would you know that the data employers are reporting is accurate?

    I feel all businesses outside of the state local and federal government should be investigated as well.

    Let me share some light on the issue, I’m a black woman who upholds an A.S. and B.S. degree in Paralegal Studies and have 5 years of legal experience, along with 7 years of insurance defense. How much should I be getting paid, now that I’m employed with a civil rights non-profit organization as a Legal Secretary?

  2. Sandy says:

    Wow! There is SO much wrong with this, I don’t even know where to start. Guess I’m going to have to find an hour of time to write a list and send it in. You people are KILLING this country!

  3. W. P. "Bill" Daly says:

    I prepared AAPs for about 20 clients – which includes a Compensation Analysis. The effective dates are spread throughout the year. It would be much more efficient to allow the option to those who have those analyses already prepared to use that data versus having to conduct a separate analysis based on W-2 earnings. So, any data prepared within the previous 12 month period as of the date of the EEO-1 report could be used.

    Also, the use of pay bands seems me to distort the data because 2 people doing the same job could end up in separate groups. I contend that EEO Job Categories should be the criteria.

    In addition, the number of hours worked seems to me to not be as good an indicator than if you used an hourly rate x 2080 hours. This would provide a clear comparison of what employers are paying based on the same unit of time. Otherwise,those getting overtime distort what the real pay rate is. Either way has issues, of course.

  4. Greg Cochran says:

    What right does the government have gathering pay information from a private employer? If you have a complaint filed to either of these agencies I can see where you might have the right but to require an employer to give you this information is downright wrong!

  5. Kathy Meyer says:

    I’ve heard that women make up the majority of college graduates over the past few years. It would be interesting to correlate education levels into this data. As a full-time, full-year working, white female veteran with a Masters degree, I’d like to see where I fit into this picture.

  6. CJ says:

    I think it is perfectly reasonable to require pay amounts with required demographic information from employers. If an employer is not discriminating they will have nothing to worry about. Most employees do not know what their counterparts make so they truly have no idea if they or someone else at their work place is being discriminated against. Obviously years of service and experience are also factors in pay as well as job performance.

  7. Susan Shinn says:

    How is DOL / EEOC dealing with Government Agencies (i.e., EPA)?? The pay gap between men and women performing the same job/duties at EPA (Fort Meade) is HUGE and nothing is being done.

  8. Dolores G. says:

    I have over 15 years experience in electronics and 3 years with my employer now. I am also 63 years and have ADA restrictions in which are the things that my employer is looking at and younger new employees with less experience and less productive with their percentage lower than mine in a day and more errors than me are getting more pay. How is that fair and how is that legal at all.